§

Superior Container, Inc.

276 N.L.R.B. 521 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Superior Container, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  3. Seeler v. Trading Port, Inc.

    517 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that where "there are disputed issues of fact in the case, the Regional Director should be given the benefit of the doubt in a proceeding for § 10(j) relief"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  5. L'Eggs Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    619 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 37 times
    Finding that statement of anti-union motive eliminates question concerning validity of proffered legitimate reason for adverse action

  6. N.L.R.B. v. American Art Industries, Inc.

    415 F.2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Upholding the Bannon Mills principle and recognizing that "to maintain the integrity of the hearing process" the ALJ properly refused to admit secondary evidence proffered by the employer which it refused to produce in the face of a valid subpoena duces tecum

  7. Struthers-Dunn, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    574 F.2d 796 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 7 times
    Denying enforcement of the Board's bargaining order when union card majority had dissipated before commission of employer's unfair labor practices because of "important goal of effectively ascertaining free choice"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Southbridge Sheet Metal Works

    380 F.2d 851 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. Southbridge Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 380 F.2d 851 (1st Cir. 1967), the First Circuit considered this precise question.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company

    398 F.2d 336 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company, Inc., 398 F.2d 336 (C.A.4), the court held that authorization cards are such unreliable indicators of the desires of the employees that an employer confronted with a demand for recognition based solely upon them is justified in withholding recognition pending the result of a certification election.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Metropolitan Alloys Corp.

    624 F.2d 743 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 1 times

    No. 78-1114. May 5, 1980. Elliott Moore, Michael S. Winer, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Susan L. Williams, Lawrence Blatnik, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. David Gunsberg, Marvin Breskin, Breskin Gunsberg, Richard A. Leasia, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Petition for the National Labor Relations Act. Before ENGEL, KEITH and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent Metropolitan