§

Superior Coach Corp.

175 N.L.R.B. 200 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Superior Coach Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  2. N.L.R.B. v. O.A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc.

    374 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 58 times
    Noting that when no anti-union animus exists, an employer is free to discharge a union employee "for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc.

    374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 34 times
    Finding inference that supervisor who walked past a sign every day saw that sign was reasonable and provided substantial evidence for the NLRB's decision

  4. Betts Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times

    No. 8813. May 26, 1967. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, R. Austin Northern, Roscoe E. Long and Brock R. Snyder, Topeka, Kan., on brief), for petitioner. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HICKEY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Longhorn Transfer Service, Inc.

    346 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times

    No. 21347. June 15, 1965. Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James J. Loeffler, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge. This is a proceeding to enforce an order

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  8. Golay Co. v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 259 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 9 times
    In Nos. 15540 and 15656, Golay Co. v. NLRB, 371 F.2d 259 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 944, 87 S.Ct. 2079, 18 L.Ed.2d 1332, we enforced the Board's order with respect to Section 8(a)(3) and (1) violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151, et seq., by respondent (Company) covering 19 of 42 employees.

  9. Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Visador Co.

    387 F.2d 368 (4th Cir. 1967)

    No. 11255. Argued November 10, 1967. Decided December 6, 1967. Joseph A. Yablonski, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Homer L. Deakins, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Thompson, Ogletree Haynsworth, Greenville, S.C., and Addington McGraw, Jasper, Tex., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"