§

Super Valu Stores, Inc.

177 N.L.R.B. 899 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Super Valu Stores, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. Betts Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times

    No. 8813. May 26, 1967. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, R. Austin Northern, Roscoe E. Long and Brock R. Snyder, Topeka, Kan., on brief), for petitioner. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HICKEY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Purity Food Stores

    376 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times
    In Purity Food Stores there were seven supermarkets — employing about 400 employees — all located north of Boston within a 30-mile radius of the company's central office with frequent interchanges of employees.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Davis Cafeteria, Inc.

    396 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 18 times
    In Davis Cafeteria, we held that the Board failed to justify the inclusion of two of eight cafeterias in Miami, Florida in a bargaining unit, while excluding the other six. This court held that the fact that a local manager has authority to hire and fire employees alone does not make an individual location an appropriate bargaining unit.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Frisch's Big Boy Ill-Mar, Inc.

    356 F.2d 895 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In Frisch's, this court refused to enforce a Board order finding a single store unit appropriate among ten restaurants in Indianapolis, Indiana. After reviewing the record, we found that the restaurants were a single, integrated enterprise and that each restaurant lacked sufficient autonomy, even though the individual restaurant manager could order supplies and merchandise and could independently hire employees within centrally prescribed wage rates.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Appleton Electric Company

    296 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Disagreeing over Board's authority to disregard accretion clauses

  9. Local 919, Retail Clerks Int'l v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 1118 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    No. 21911. Argued February 19, 1969. Decided March 26, 1969. Mr. Warren H. Pyle, Boston, Mass., of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. S.G. Lippman and George R. Murphy, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Donald Grody, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Robert A. Giannasi, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick