§

Sunshine Food Markets, Inc.

176 N.L.R.B. 252 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Sunshine Food Markets, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Laney Duke Storage Warehouse Co.

    369 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 59 times
    In Laney Duke, the ALJ had ordered the employer to read the notice to any employee who requested it, but the Board had expanded this to require a reading to all employees, singly or collectively, whether or not requested. The Fifth Circuit denied enforcement because it considered this remedy "unnecessarily embarrassing and humiliating to management rather than effectuating the policies of the Act."

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. James Thompson

    208 F.2d 743 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 41 times
    Reinstating ALJ's findings after Board reversal

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Purity Food Stores

    376 F.2d 497 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times
    In Purity Food Stores there were seven supermarkets — employing about 400 employees — all located north of Boston within a 30-mile radius of the company's central office with frequent interchanges of employees.

  6. Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to § 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  8. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Saxe

    134 F.2d 16 (D.C. Cir. 1943)   Cited 43 times
    In Saxe, the insurer relied on a condition precedent requiring statements to be true before the insurance policy took effect.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Purity Food Stores, Inc.

    354 F.2d 926 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 11 times

    No. 6582. Heard November 1, 1965. Decided December 30, 1965. Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Allen M. Hutter, Attorney, were on brief, for petitioner. Allan A. Tepper, Boston, Mass., with whom Snyder, Tepper, Berlin Katz, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and McENTEE, Circuit Judges. By designation

  10. Trey Packing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    405 F.2d 334 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 193-196, Dockets 32559-32561, 32713. Argued November 20, 1968. Decided December 11, 1968. Certiorari Denied March 24, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 1191. John J. Bracken, Bracken Walsh, Newark, N.J., for petitioners. Glen M. Bendixsen, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Edward E. Wall, Washington, D.C.), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District