§

Sunset Lumber Products

113 N.L.R.B. 1172 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Sunset Lumber Products

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron

    216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed

    206 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13310. June 22, 1953. As Amended August 12, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls and Ruth C. Goldman, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent George W. Reed. Watson A. Garoni, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent In. Hod Carriers, etc. Before STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Oertel Brewing Co.

    197 F.2d 59 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 12 times

    No. 11442. May 29, 1952. T.J. McDermott, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, and Frederick U. Reel, all of Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Grover G. Sales, Herman Cohen, Louisville, Ky., for respondents. Grover G. Sales, Louisville, Ky., on brief, for Oertel Brewing Co. Herman Cohen, Louisville, Ky, for Carpenters Dist. Council of United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Star Pub. Co.

    97 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 465, branch managers were held to be employees, while in National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 488, a foreman was reinstated upon the ground that he had been unfairly discharged.

  9. J.A. Utley Company v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.2d 885 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 12240, 12250. December 27, 1954. Robert C. Winter, Detroit, Mich. (H. Wm. Butler, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for J.A. Utley Co. George E. Ganos, Detroit, Mich. (Boaz Siegel, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for Millwrights' Local. James A. Ryan, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for N.L.R.B. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case, the employer company and a local millwrights'

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.

    193 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 12775. November 30, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose and Melvin Pollack, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Barzee, Leedy Keane and Hugh L. Barzee, Portland, Or., for respondents Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. and others. Green, Landye Richardson, Burl L. Green, J. Robert Patterson and Donald S. Richardson, Portland, Or., for respondents