§

Sunoco, Inc.

03-CA-025293 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 11, 2006)
Sunoco, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs

  3. Dorsey Trailers v. National Labor Relations

    134 F.3d 125 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 96-3392 and 96-3578. Argued June 26, 1997. Filed January 13, 1998. Michael S. Mitchell, Esq., Robert E. Larkin, III, Esq., Fisher Phillips, 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3710, New Orleans, Louisiana 70170, Attorneys for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, Dorsey Trailers. Robert J. Englehart, Esq., Charles P. Donnelly, Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20570, Attorney for Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board

  4. Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second