§

Summer Hill Nursing Home

222 N.L.R.B. 433 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Summer Hill Nursing Home

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 507 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Mueller Brass Co.

    501 F.2d 680 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 14 times
    Explaining and applying doctrine of provoked insubordination

  5. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"

  6. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    357 F.2d 500 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times

    No. 20069. March 3, 1966. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton, Frank Simpson, III, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Michael N. Sohn, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and CURTIS, District Judge. CURTIS, District Judge: We have before us a petition to set aside the decision and order of the NLRB requiring the

  7. Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 529 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13960. Argued November 2, 1962. Decided December 26, 1962. Robert Lewis, New York City, (Jackson Lewis, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Standau E. Weinbrecht, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Nancy M. Sherman, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge

  8. Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  9. N.L.R.B. v. United Mineral Chemical Corp.

    391 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In United Mineral & Chemical Corp., the Second Circuit stated that the fact-finder could validly conclude based on witness testimony that the theft had not occurred. 391 F.2d at 833.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Transport, Inc.

    343 F.2d 558 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17667. April 14, 1965. Duane R. Batista, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. Karl Mueller, of Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., made argument for the respondent and filed brief with Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. Before MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges, and