§

Sumitomo Chemical Company v. Celgard

09546266 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 3, 2014)
Sumitomo Chemical Company v. Celgard

4 Cited authorities

  1. Section 317 - Settlement

    35 U.S.C. § 317   Cited 37 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Addressing continuation of IPR as to some petitioners after dismissal of others

  2. Section 42.73 - Judgment

    37 C.F.R. § 42.73   Cited 18 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Regarding judgments

  3. Section 42.20 - Generally

    37 C.F.R. § 42.20   Cited 16 times   38 Legal Analyses

    (a)Relief. Relief, other than a petition requesting the institution of a trial, must be requested in the form of a motion. (b)Prior authorization. A motion will not be entered without Board authorization. Authorization may be provided in an order of general applicability or during the proceeding. (c)Burden of proof. The moving party has the burden of proof to establish that it is entitled to the requested relief. (d)Briefing. The Board may order briefing on any issue involved in the trial. 37 C.F

  4. Section 42.74 - Settlement

    37 C.F.R. § 42.74   Cited 3 times   13 Legal Analyses

    (a)Board role. The parties may agree to settle any issue in a proceeding, but the Board is not a party to the settlement and may independently determine any question of jurisdiction, patentability, or Office practice. (b)Agreements in writing. Any agreement or understanding between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of a proceeding shall be in writing and a true copy shall be filed with the Board before the termination of the trial. (c)Request to keep separate