§

Stumpf Motor Co., Inc.

208 N.L.R.B. 431 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Stumpf Motor Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Kaiser Agr. Chem., Div. of Kaiser

    473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 37 times

    No. 72-1379. February 2, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Director, Thaddeus R. Sobieski, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. John E. McFall, Andrew C. Partee, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Petition for enforcement from the National Labor Relations Board. Before RIVES, WISDOM and RONEY, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent

  3. J.C. Penney Co. v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 479 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8874. August 29, 1967. William C. McClearn, Denver, Colo. (Robert L. Morris, Morris B. Hecox, Denver, Colo., Eugene F. Rowan and Martin Zeiger, New York City, with him on brief), for petitioner. Peter M. Giesey, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This matter arises from two separate unfair

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

    390 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dan Howard, supra, 390 F.2d at page 309, we further stated: "The court [Sixth Circuit] pointed out that it is relevant to consider the subjective intention of the signer and his expressed state of mind in deciding whether a misapprehension was knowingly induced."

  5. Federation of Un. Representatives v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 407, 408, Dockets 28558, 28598. Argued June 10, 1964. Decided November 20, 1964. Sanford M. Katz, New York City, for Federation of Union Representatives. Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Julius Topol, New York City, on the brief), for International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Richman Brothers Company

    387 F.2d 809 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 3 times

    No. 16159. December 13, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard Adelman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank C. Heath, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, Jones, Day, Cockley Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and CASTLE and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. National Labor Relations Board petitions pursuant to