Stout Industries, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Lockheed Martin. v. Network Solutions

    194 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 642 times
    Holding that the court must consider “the extent of control exercised by the defendant over the third party's means of infringement”
  2. Data Concepts, Inc. v. Digital Consulting

    150 F.3d 620 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "DCI" and "dci" were too dissimilar to support tacking
  3. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.

    175 F.R.D. 640 (C.D. Cal. 1997)   Cited 41 times
    Finding that "[d]omain names, like trade names, do not act as trademarks when they are used to identify a business entity; in order to infringe they must be used to identify the source of goods or services" and "where . . . the pure machine-linking function is the only use at issue, there is no trademark use and there can be no infringement."
  4. In re Advertising Marketing Development

    821 F.2d 614 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that advertising firm had used THE NOW GENERATION as a mark for its promotional services based on letterhead naming itself as the "creators, producers and suppliers of THE NOW GENERATION sales promotion services" as well as "postcard and magazine advertising specimens to the same effect"
  5. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,886 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark