Storer Communications, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
454 U.S. 404 (1982) Cited 116 times
Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 times
Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 118 times
In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Huck Mfg. Co. v. NLRB
693 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir. 1983) Cited 29 times
Finding of no impasse supported by fact that "Union's chief negotiator testified that he never felt the parties were at an impasse"
Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
523 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 37 times
No. 74-2325. Argued June 10, 1975. Decided October 1, 1975. As Amended October 15, 1975. W. Bruce Baird, Matthew R. Westfall, Middleton, Reutlinger Baird, Louisville, Ky., Jay S. Siegel, Siegel, O'Connor Kainen, Hartford, Conn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Hope P. Zelasko, Emil C. Farkas, Regional Director, 9th Region, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Segal, Isenberg, Sales, Stewart Nutt
Carpenter Sprinkler Corp. v. N.L.R.B
605 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1979) Cited 31 times
Concluding that since "the Board is not required to observe automatically all the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases in court," it was entitled to create a new evidentiary rule
N.L.R.B. v. Cauthorne
691 F.2d 1023 (D.C. Cir. 1982) Cited 24 times 1 Legal Analyses
Ongoing liability for ULP ends when parties reach agreement or good-faith impasse
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,873 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

Storer Communications, Inc.

26 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

Finding of no impasse supported by fact that "Union's chief negotiator testified that he never felt the parties were at an impasse"

Concluding that since "the Board is not required to observe automatically all the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases in court," it was entitled to create a new evidentiary rule

Ongoing liability for ULP ends when parties reach agreement or good-faith impasse

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions