All State & Fed.
JX
Search with
Parallel Search
Enter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
or
Keyword Search
Enter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
AND
fraud AND damages
Both terms in document
OR
car OR automobile
Either term in document
NOT
infringement NOT patent
Term must not appear in document
""
"due diligence"
Exact match
()
appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)
Grouping terms
*
withdr*w
Single letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
!
infring!
Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
/n
investor /5 diligence
Terms within n words of each other
/s
fees /s reasonable
Terms within same sentence
/p
admissible /p warrant
Terms within the same paragraph
Search the Law
Search
Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I.
uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
File picker
Drag a complaint or brief here
Upload a complaint or brief
Or,
choose a document to upload
Choose Document
Secure
§
Help
Sign In
Stiffel Co. v. Mustaki, S. A.
CANC (T.T.A.B. May. 1, 1997)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
Citing Briefs
Briefs
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
2
Stiffel Co. v. Mustaki, S. A.
2
Cited authorities
In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)
Cited 194 times
33 Legal Analyses
Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
Kenner Parker Toys v. Rose Art Industries
963 F.2d 350 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Cited 51 times
Holding that in light of the appearance, sound and meaning of the marks PLAY-DOH and FUNDOUGH, consumers may receive the "same commercial impression" from the marks
