§

Stevens Pontiac-Gmc, Inc.

295 N.L.R.B. 599 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Stevens Pontiac-Gmc, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Yorke v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 1138 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that those injured during the trustee's administration of an estate are entitled to an administrative priority regardless of whether their injury was caused by a tort or other wrongdoing

  2. Miller v. Wrightstown T.C. as

    595 F.2d 1213 (3d Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Dismissing plaintiff's complaint, which alleged a conspiracy to commit various torts, for failure to state a claim

  3. Filler Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 369 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times
    In Filler Products Inc. v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 369, 378 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1967), the court reiterated that "[o]ne of the established ways to determine in disputed cases when an employee is discharged is to ascertain when he was replaced."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Regal Aluminum, Inc.

    436 F.2d 525 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Regal Aluminum, Inc., 436 F.2d 525, 529 (8th Cir. 1971), we stated that the "Board draws on a fund of knowledge and expertise all its own, and its choice of remedy must therefore be given special respect by reviewing courts.... `[I]t is usually better to minimize the opportunity for reviewing courts to substitute their discretion for that of the agency.'"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical Co.

    420 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times

    No. 27714. December 22, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, NLRB, Douglas L. Leslie, Atty., Washington, D.C., Elmer P. Davis, Director, Region 16, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., for petitioner. J.H. Hanes, Wayne Hancock, Midland, Mich., Max D. Rizley, Tulsa, Okla., Karl H. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, THORNBERRY and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Quick Shop Markets, Inc.

    416 F.2d 601 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times
    In Quick Shop Markets, the Seventh Circuit agreed with the fact-finder's conclusion regarding pretext and noted that the employer did not care to investigate or determine the identity of the employee responsible for the cash shortages.