§

Steven Markley, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Mid West Region), Agency.

01a04633 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 13, 2000)
Steven Markley, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Mid West Region), Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,191 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,615 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  4. Cygnar v. City of Chicago

    865 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 168 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence that patronage targets' names were known by defendant to be on Democratic Party contributors' list sufficient to support finding that defendant knew, despite his denial, of their political affiliations

  5. Montgomery Elevator v. Bldg. Engineering Servs

    730 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Applying Louisiana law