§

Stephen-Son-Yost Steel

294 N.L.R.B. 395 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Stephen-Son-Yost Steel

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plymouth Stamping Division, Eltec Corp.

    870 F.2d 1112 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that company’s decision to transfer and subcontract its parts assembly operation was a mandatory bargaining subject because the transfer did not significantly alter the nature of the company’s business, company incurred no significant capital expenditures, and transfer occurred shortly after company unsuccessfully sought economic concessions from the union

  4. Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 24 times
    Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union

  5. Teamsters Local Union No. 175 v. N.L.R.B

    788 F.2d 27 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    Referring to the Board's recent construction of the term "bargaining impasse" under Section 8 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158