Stemun Manufacturing Co., Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
  2. Halliday v. U.S.

    315 U.S. 94 (1942)   Cited 27 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 101. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided January 19, 1942. 1. Evidence held sufficient to go to the jury on the question whether petitioner, holder of a War Risk Insurance policy expiring October 31, 1920, was totally and permanently disabled on or before that day, and thereafter. P. 96. 2. In proving that the insured became totally and permanently disabled before the expiration of his War Risk contract, evidence of his conduct and

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Stemun Mfg. Co.

    386 F.2d 174 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17395. November 24, 1967. Alan D. Eisenberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Roy E. Browne, Akron, Ohio, Hershey, Browne, Wilson, Steel, Cook Wolfe, Akron, Ohio, of counsel, on brief for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PECK and COMBS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.

    130 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 10 times

    No. 3549. September 16, 1942. Petition for an Order to Show Cause and an Order to Adjust in Contempt. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to have the Reed Prince Manufacturing Company and certain of its officers adjudged in contempt of court. Order in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jay Clark, Jr., and George H. Mason, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER