§

Stella B.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.

0520170314 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 11, 2018)
Stella B.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Helen L. v. DiDario

    46 F.3d 325 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 232 times
    Holding that DPW violated the ADA by requiring that plaintiff receive required care services in a nursing home rather than in her own home through an attendant care program

  2. Conneen v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.

    334 F.3d 318 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 175 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that employer bank made good faith effort to engage in interactive process with employee who demonstrated excessive tardiness; the breakdown of the interactive process was due to the plaintiff employee's conduct

  3. Hutchinson v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

    883 F. Supp. 379 (N.D. Iowa 1995)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that a "100% healed" policy is a per se violation of the ADA but that the plaintiff could not assert that violation because she received individualized treatment despite the policy

  4. Flynn v. Distinctive Home Care, Inc.

    812 F.3d 422 (5th Cir. 2016)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "[a]lthough this Circuit has not directly addressed the issue, other federal circuit and district courts overwhelmingly agree that a plaintiff may only sue a defendant under Title I of the ADA if the plaintiff is an employee, rather than an independent contractor, of the defendant," and holding that because plaintiff conceded she was an independent contractor of defendant, she could not sue defendant under the ADA

  5. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,391 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  6. Section 12117 - Enforcement

    42 U.S.C. § 12117   Cited 3,420 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Adopting exhaustion procedures set forth in Title VII for ADA claims

  7. Section 1614.203 - Rehabilitation Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.203   Cited 265 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the regulations set forth in 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 to claims under § 501

  8. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"