STEIN, INC.

Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
2 F.3d 1162 (D.C. Cir. 1993) Cited 30 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."
Local 58, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
888 F.3d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 2018) Cited 1 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that the NLRB has interpreted Section 7 of the NLRA as protecting an employee's right to revoke a prior authorization for the deduction of union dues and that Section 8 provides that it is an unfair labor practice for the labor organization or its agents to restrain an employee's exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WTVJ, Inc.
268 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 16 times
Enforcing Board decision that found violation based on a theory of wrongdoing different from the theory relied upon by the ALJ
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod
109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940) Cited 28 times
In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."