§

Steelworkers Local 7912 (U.S. Tsubaki)

338 N.L.R.B. 29 (N.L.R.B. 2002)
Steelworkers Local 7912 (U.S. Tsubaki)

6 Cited authorities

  1. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  3. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  4. Aeron. Indus. Dist. L. 91 v. United Tech

    230 F.3d 569 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that courts may "look to extrinsic factors" only "when provisions are ambiguous"

  5. King Soopers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    254 F.3d 738 (8th Cir. 2001)   Cited 7 times
    In King Soopers, Inc. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 738, 743 (8th Cir. 2001), the court also identified “distance between the old and new plants” as a relevant factor.

  6. Aeronautical Indus. Dist. Lodge 91 v. United Tech.

    87 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Conn. 2000)   Cited 3 times

    No. Civ.A.3:99CV1827 (JCH). February 18, 2000 Gregg D. Adler, Livingston, Adler, Pulda Meiklejohn, Hartford, CT, for Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 91 of the International Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, plaintiff. Henry A. Platt, Gary L. Lieber, Anessa Abrams, Schmeltzer, Aptaker Shepard, Washington, DC, Edward J. Dempsey, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, CT, for United Technologies Corp. Pratt Whitney Division, defendant. OPINION HALL, District Judge. Aeronautical