§

Steelbuilding.com, Inc.

No. 76280389 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 12, 2006)
Steelbuilding.com, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. In re Bayer

    488 F.3d 960 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 41 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Endorsing the use of internet evidence as admissible and competent evidence for evaluating a trademark

  2. In re Steelbuilding.com

    415 F.3d 1293 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 26 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the refusal of the Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark STEELBUILDING.COM, because the mark was descriptive of online services for the design of steel buildings, and lacked secondary meaning

  3. Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co.

    840 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding secondary meaning for shape of guitar head always appearing in advertising and promotional literature

  4. In re Reed

    482 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board properly considered websites containing "lawyer.com" or "lawyers.com" in their domain names to determine what the relevant public would understand LAWYERS.COM to mean

  5. Application of Automatic Radio Mfg. Co.

    404 F.2d 1391 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 18 times

    Patent Appeal Nos. 7994, 7995. January 16, 1969. David Wolf, Wolf, Greenfield Hieken, Boston, Mass., for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C. (Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, SMITH, ALMOND, and BALDWIN, Judges. RICH, Judge. These are two ex parte trademark appeals from decisions of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board covered in a single opinion, 150 USPQ 70, and argued together in this

  6. Application of Superior Outdoor Display

    478 F.2d 1388 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 7 times

    Patent Appeal Nos. 8956, 8957. June 14, 1973. Fred Flam, Flam Flam, Encino, Cal., attys. of record, for appellant. D. Paul Weaver, of counsel. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Fred E. McKelvey, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, Associate Judges, and ALMOND, Senior Judge. MARKEY, Chief Judge. These appeals are from two decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

  7. Application of Chesapeake Corp. of Virginia

    420 F.2d 754 (C.C.P.A. 1970)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8251. February 5, 1970. Jacobi, Davidson Jacobi, Washington, D.C., attorneys of record, for appellant; Siegfried A. Schoedel, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents, D. Lenore Lady, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, ALMOND, BALDWIN, LANE, Judges, and McMANUS, Chief Judge, sitting by designation. ALMOND, Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 154 USP 248

  8. Application of Hollywood Brands

    214 F.2d 139 (C.C.P.A. 1954)   Cited 11 times
    Finding secondary meaning based upon $1,153,000 in general advertising over six years with about one-third directed to the alleged trademark

  9. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,611 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"