§

Ste-Mel Signs, Inc.

246 N.L.R.B. 1110 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Ste-Mel Signs, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Armcor Industries, Inc.

    535 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 51 times
    Denying enforcement of bargaining orders

  4. Peerless of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Peerless, we stated that the Board's decision to issue such an order must be accompanied by "`specific findings' as to the immediate and residual impact of unfair labor practices on the election process... and `a detailed analysis' assessing the possibility of holding a fair election... and the potential effectiveness of ordinary remedies."

  5. First Lakewood Assoc. v. N.L.R.B

    582 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 31 times
    Declining enforcement of a bargaining order where the supervisor directly responsible for most of the violations departed six weeks before the election

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rothkin

    434 F.2d 1051 (6th Cir. 1970)

    No. 20259. December 17, 1970. On Petition to Enforce an Order of National Labor Relations Board. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Russell J. Thomas, Jr., Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John A. Daily, Harry W. Schwab, Johnson, Whitmer Sayre, Akron, Ohio, for respondent. Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. ORDER. This cause is before the Court on the petition