§

Staunton Fuel & Material

335 N.L.R.B. 717 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Staunton Fuel & Material

43 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 329 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."

  3. Textron Lycoming Recip. Engine Div. v. Auto. Workers

    523 U.S. 653 (1998)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that [s]ection 301 jurisdiction does not lie where plaintiff union sought declaratory judgment that a CBA was voidable

  4. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  5. Breuer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Toronado Systems of America, Inc.

    687 F.2d 182 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 265 times
    Holding existence of settlement negotiations admissible to rebut claim that party had no knowledge of suit

  6. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  7. Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.

    641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"

  9. Sheet Metal Workers' Inter'l v. Herre Bros

    201 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 1999)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer acted inconsistently with its noticed intent to withdraw from group bargaining where employer repeatedly requested information and spoke with negotiators concerning a contract to take effect after the date of withdrawal

  10. U.S. v. Hauert

    40 F.3d 197 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that the prosecution's misstatement as to the burden of proof did not constitute reversible error because "the district court's instructions made it clear that the burden of proof remained with the government throughout"

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,329 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355