§

States Steamship Co.

219 N.L.R.B. 1252 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
States Steamship Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Arnett v. Kennedy

    416 U.S. 134 (1974)   Cited 1,597 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal statute authorizing discharge of federal employees for "such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service" was neither void for vagueness nor overbroad in light of "longstanding principles of employer-employee relationships" and "[the availability of legal counsel] to employees who [sought] advice on the interpretation of the Act and its regulations"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Transport Clearings, Inc.

    311 F.2d 519 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 29 times

    No. 19423. December 27, 1962. Rehearing Denied January 21, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Giesey, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Malone, Seay Gwinn, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges and SIMPSON, District Judge. BELL, Circuit Judge. The Labor Board seeks enforcement of an order finding that the employer violated

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Phaostron Instrument Elec. Co.

    344 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19505. April 27, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Michael R. Brown, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erwin Lerten, Potruch Lerten, Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks full enforcement of its Order (146 N.L.R.B. No. 124), issued after a hearing and

  8. Federation of Un. Representatives v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 407, 408, Dockets 28558, 28598. Argued June 10, 1964. Decided November 20, 1964. Sanford M. Katz, New York City, for Federation of Union Representatives. Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Julius Topol, New York City, on the brief), for International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National

  9. N.L.R.B. v. J. P. Stevens Co.

    464 F.2d 1326 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    Holding Stevens in civil contempt for failure to comply with Court of Appeals order affirming NLRB enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease