§

State Plaza Hotel

347 N.L.R.B. 755 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
State Plaza Hotel

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  5. Coronet Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    981 F.2d 1284 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Coronet, discussed supra, Coronet made the argument that the Board abused its discretion in failing to consider the decision of the district court, which held that there was an undue burden in implementing the temporary relief because of financial hardship.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Health Care Logistics, Inc.

    784 F.2d 232 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that employer committed unfair labor practice by discharging two employees engaged in protected union activity but did not engage in unfair employment practice when it discharged similarly active employee who performed poorly during his probationary period

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  8. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment