§

State Bank of India

229 N.L.R.B. 838 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
State Bank of India

8 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,296 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional

    372 U.S. 10 (1963)   Cited 284 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

  3. Foley Bros. v. Filardo

    336 U.S. 281 (1949)   Cited 249 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal Eight Hour Law did not apply overseas where legislative history revealed that Congress was primarily concerned with domestic employment conditions

  4. Blackmer v. United States

    284 U.S. 421 (1932)   Cited 297 times
    Finding witness in contempt when continuation of trial delayed witness's testimony because “[i]t was the duty of the [witness] to respond to the subpoena and to remain in attendance until excused by the court or by the government's representatives”

  5. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo

    353 U.S. 138 (1957)   Cited 143 times
    Holding the LMRA inapplicable to the picketing of a foreign ship operated entirely by foreign seamen

  6. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.

    213 U.S. 347 (1909)   Cited 279 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that complaint based upon foreign conduct "alleges no case under the [Sherman Act]"

  7. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Bank of Am., Etc

    130 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1942)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 9784, 9785. September 14, 1942. Rehearing Denied December 17, 1942. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petitions for enforcement of order of the National Labor Relations Board against Bank of America National Trust Savings Association based on violations by respondent of the National Labor Relations Act, § 8(1, 3), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(1, 3), by the discriminatory discharge of a certain employee and of a group of employees. Orders modified and as modified

  8. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 115,254 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"