Standard Knitting, Ltd. v. Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
13 Cited authorities
Kingsdown Medical Consultants v. Hollister
863 F.2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 554 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding even “ ‘gross negligence’ does not of itself justify an inference of intent to deceive”
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Wheeler
814 F.2d 812 (1st Cir. 1987) Cited 136 timesHolding "Beetle" similar to "Beetle Barn"
In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 191 times 33 Legal AnalysesReciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
Nautilus Group v. Icon Health and Fitness
372 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2004) Cited 29 timesHolding that the district court's finding of "actual confusion" was improper where "the relatively small number of calls presented by Nautilus renders this evidence too unreliable"
Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L
808 F.2d 46 (Fed. Cir. 1986) Cited 52 times 3 Legal AnalysesAffirming TTAB's cancellation of trademark for fraudulently obtaining registration
Shen Manufacturing Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.
393 F.3d 1238 (Fed. Cir. 2004) Cited 20 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that textually identical "RITZ" marks used in cooking classes and kitchen textiles were dissimilar
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products Co.
994 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1993) Cited 21 timesGiving Chevron deference to the TTAB's interpretation of the Lanham Act
Dan Robbins Associates v. Questor Corp.
599 F.2d 1009 (C.C.P.A. 1979) Cited 27 timesInvolving cancellation for likelihood of confusion
Jaguar Cars Ltd. v. Skandrani
771 F. Supp. 1178 (S.D. Fla. 1991) Cited 12 timesFinding that "Defendant's state trademark registration [was] not to be accorded any weight in [the court's] analysis since state trademark law and registration cannot override rights provided by federal law or federal registrations"
Otto Roth Co. v. Universal Foods Corp.
640 F.2d 1317 (C.C.P.A. 1981) Cited 20 timesRecognizing importance of "free use of the language" in commercial speech context