§

Standard Innovation Corporation v. LELO, Inc.

11344987 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 13, 2015)
Standard Innovation Corporation v. LELO, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. In re Cronyn

    890 F.2d 1158 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 64 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a thesis presentation made to a handful of faculty and not catalogued or indexed in a "meaningful" way was not a printed publication

  2. Lelo Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

    786 F.3d 879 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 2 times   8 Legal Analyses

    No. 2013–1582. 05-11-2015 LELO INC., Leloi AB, Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee. Standard Innovation (US) Corp., Standard Innovation Corporation, Intervenors. Hector Julian Ribera, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by Marion N.G. Miller ; Lauren Estelle Whittemore, San Francisco, CA. Michael Haldenstein, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented

  3. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 5,941 times   957 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"

  4. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,166 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication

  5. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 21 times   40 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A

  6. Section 42.123 - Filing of supplemental information

    37 C.F.R. § 42.123   Cited 8 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that the late submission of supplemental information must be in the interests of justice