§

Stanadyne Automotive Corp.

345 N.L.R.B. 85 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Stanadyne Automotive Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson

    449 U.S. 1034 (1980)   Cited 129 times

    No. 80-404. December 8, 1980. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 620 F. 2d 530.

  4. ITT Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    251 F.3d 995 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing Hudgens v. NLRB, 424 U.S. 507, 96 S.Ct. 1029, 47 L.Ed.2d 196, and Eastex, 437 U.S. at 571, 98 S.Ct. 2505

  5. Ryder Truck Rental v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that an employer's explanation that it discharged an employee because the employee falsified maintenance reports was pretextual because the employer had never discharged other employees based on this offense and the employer had instructed employees to falsify maintenance reports

  6. Bloomington-Normal Seating Co. v. N.L.R.B

    357 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 8 times

    No. 03-2929, 03-3101. Argued January 21, 2004. Decided February 5, 2004. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 33-CA-13769. Gary A. Wincek (argued), Laner, Muchin, Dumbrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Will J. Vance, National Labor Relations Board, Peoria, IL, Aileen Armstrong, Arthur F. Rosenfeld (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and RIPPLE

  7. Marathon LeTourneau, Longview Div. v. N.L.R.B

    699 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that enforcing a disciplinary rule unevenly violates the Act

  8. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Styletek, Div. of Pandel-Bradford

    520 F.2d 275 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times

    No. 75-1017. Argued June 3, 1975. Decided August 6, 1975. Margery E. Lieber, Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. George H. Foley, Boston, Mass., with whom Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE