Stagehands Referral Service

8 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Lucas v. N.L.R.B
333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 13 times
Defining substantial evidence
Boilermakers Local No. 374 v. N.L.R.B
852 F.2d 1353 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 13 times
In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.
Int'l Union of Operating Engr. v. N.L.R.B
496 F.2d 1308 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 6 times
No. 73-1760. Argued January 29, 1974. Decided May 31, 1974. Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Alan S. Belkin, Belkin Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief. Stuart Rosenblum, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David Miller, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bricklayers Local No. 7
563 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 3 times
No. 76-3420. October 28, 1977. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Michael F. Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Russell Specter and Laura Stevens, Neyhart, Anderson Freitas, Bricklayers Local No. 7, Bricklayers, Masons and Plasterers' Intern. Union of America, AFL-CIO, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TRASK, WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The issue on
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l U. of Operating Engineers
555 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1977) Cited 3 times
In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.

Stagehands Referral Service

8 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Defining substantial evidence

In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.

In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.