§

Stage Employees Iatse Local 41 (Theater Of Stars)

278 N.L.R.B. 89 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Stage Employees Iatse Local 41 (Theater Of Stars)

10 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,571 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Boilermakers v. Hardeman

    401 U.S. 233 (1971)   Cited 185 times
    Holding that secion 412 of the LMRDA explicitly vests district courts with jurisdiction over LMRDA claims

  3. International B. Boilermakers, v. Braswell

    388 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that punitive damages are available against a union under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959

  4. MacKenzie v. Local 624, Intern. U., Etc.

    472 F. Supp. 1025 (N.D. Miss. 1979)   Cited 21 times

    No. EC 78-217-S-O. June 4, 1979. George A. MacKenzie, pro se. Charles T. Sykes, Jr., Gulfport, Miss., for Unions. Taylor B. Smith, Threadgill Smith, Columbus, Miss., for defendant Al Johnson Construction Co. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ORMA R. SMITH, District Judge. I. Plaintiff brings this action, pro se, against defendants International Union of Operating Engineers (I.U.O.E.), Local 624 of the International Union of Operating Engineers (Local 624), Al Johnson Construction Company (Company), R.H. Byrd

  5. Vandeventer v. Local Union No. 513 of the International Union of Operating Engineers

    579 F.2d 1373 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that primarily circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support verdict that union had taken retaliatory action

  6. Intern. U. of Oper. Eng. Local 406 v. N.L.R.B

    701 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.

  7. Connell v. United States Steel Corporation

    516 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times

    No. 74-2156. July 25, 1975. William C. Knight, Jr., D. Frank Davis, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants. George C. Longshore, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Before MURRAH, WISDOM and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. Senior Circuit Judge of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This is a class action brought by Willie Connell on behalf of mine foremen who went out on strike in

  8. Barunica v. United Hatters, Etc., L. Number 55

    321 F.2d 764 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times

    No. 17237. August 19, 1963. Garnet W. Taylor, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant. John M. Schobel, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee, Gruenberg Schobel, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel, on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and YOUNG, District Judge. BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. This is a damage action by a union member against her union. The defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint was sustained by the district court for the stated reason that "plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative

  9. Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 411   Cited 1,753 times
    Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action

  10. Section 523 - Retention of rights under other Federal and State laws

    29 U.S.C. § 523   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Except as explicitly provided to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall reduce or limit the responsibilities of any labor organization or any officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative of a labor organization, or of any trust in which a labor organization is interested, under any other Federal law or under the laws of any State, and, except as explicitly provided to the contrary, nothing in this chapter shall take away any right or bar any remedy to which members of a labor organization