§

St. Vincent Medical Center

349 N.L.R.B. 365 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
St. Vincent Medical Center

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 655 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Healthcare Employees Union v. N.L.R.B

    463 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 22 times
    Listing circuit cases

  4. Reno Hilton Resorts v. N.L.R.B

    196 F.3d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 24 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the decision to contract out is suspect" where it "came on the heels of heavy union activity" and the employer knew of the purported rationale for its subcontracting decision long before it implemented that decision

  5. Healthcare Employees Union v. N.R.R.B

    441 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    No. 03-72029. Argued and Submitted February 9, 2005. Filed March 17, 2006. David A. Rosenfeld (brief argued) and M. Suzanne Murphy (brief), Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, Oakland, CA, attorneys for the petitioner. Meredith L. Jason (argued) and David Habenstreit and Jill A. Griffin (brief), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., attorneys for the respondent. Gordon A. Letter (brief and argued), Littler Mendelson, Los Angeles, CA, attorneys for the respondent-intervenor. On Petition for Review