§

St. Louis Harbor Service Co.

150 N.L.R.B. 636 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
St. Louis Harbor Service Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baldwin L. Works

    128 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 60 times
    Modifying and enforced an order by the Board

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

    307 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times
    Granting enforcement petition based on finding that "there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion" viewing the "separate legal entities as a single employing enterprise"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Maintenance Corporation

    283 F.2d 569 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 40, Docket 26255. Argued October 4, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Elliott Moore, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Friedlander Gaines, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, Norbert Ruttenberg, Edward Cherney, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before HINCKS, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN

  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. 542, Int'l Un. of Operating E

    329 F.2d 512 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 14426. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided March 10, 1964. Arthur Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Charles A. Wolfe, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., Gerard F. Treanor, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondents International Union of

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fulton Bag

    180 F.2d 68 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 7 times

    No. 3932. January 3, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 15, 1950. Edward Friedman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Mozart G. Ratner and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief) for petitioner. Kenneth W. Robinson Denver, Colo. (Robert D. Charlton and Robert Swanson Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"