§

St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corporation

10151423 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 16, 2013)
St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. Volcano Corporation

8 Cited authorities

  1. Graham County Soil v. U.S. ex rel. Wilson

    559 U.S. 280 (2010)   Cited 465 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding “administrative” refers to activities of governmental agencies or their contractors

  2. Vivid Technologies v. American Science

    200 F.3d 795 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 730 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that party opposing summary judgment must show either that movant has not established its entitlement to judgment on the undisputed facts or that material issues of fact require resolution by trial

  3. Information Systems Networks Corp. v. U.S.

    994 F.2d 792 (Fed. Cir. 1993)   Cited 37 times
    Concluding that there was excusable neglect under Rule 60(b) where the delay was based on a misunderstanding by the attorney

  4. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 156,633 times   194 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  5. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 537 times   880 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  6. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 370 times   625 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  7. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 45 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution

  8. Section 42.302 - Who may petition for a covered business method patent review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.302   Cited 4 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a petitioner for CBM review must have been "sued for infringement or ... charged with infringement" and then defining only "charged with infringement"