§

St. Francis Medical Center

347 N.L.R.B. 368 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
St. Francis Medical Center

6 Cited authorities

  1. Lewin v. Schwieker

    654 F.2d 631 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 892 times
    Holding that the hearing decision must include a statement of the facts on which the ALJ's conclusion is based so that a reviewing court may understand the decision's basis

  2. National Labor Rel. v. Taylor Mach. Prods

    136 F.3d 507 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 96-6047 Argued: December 11, 1997 Decided and Filed: February 18, 1998 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 ARGUED: Anthony A. Asher, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Ronald S. Lederman, Scott D. Norton, SULLIVAN, WARD, BONE, TYLER ASHER, Southfield, Michigan, for Respondent. David Habenstreit, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cutting, Inc.

    701 F.2d 659 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting an ALJ's credibility findings where the ALJ's adverse inferences were "contrary to direct, positive testimony"

  4. K-Mart Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    62 F.3d 209 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 94-3528, 94-3634 ARGUED MAY 11, 1995 DECIDED AUGUST 11, 1995 Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, IL, Aileen A. Armstrong, Vincent Falvo (argued), Paul J. Spielberg, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, for N.L.R.B. in No. 94-3634. John W. Noble, Jr. (argued), Rivkin, Radler Kremer, Chicago, IL, for K-Mart Corp. in No. 94-3634. Peggy A. Hillman (argued), Indianapolis, In, Thomas R. Carpenter, Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Local 705, Chicago, IL, for Truck

  5. J.P. Stevens Co. v. N.L.R.B

    417 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Finding repeated violations of National Labor Relations Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Knogo Corp.

    727 F.2d 55 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 12 times
    In Knogo we said that among the mitigating factors the NLRB is obliged to consider before issuing a bargaining order are the passage of time and the rate of employee turnover and we held that "[a]lthough `we must guard against rewarding an employer for his own misconduct or delaying tactics,'" At 60, quoting Jamaica Towing, 632 F.2d at 214, where the company was not responsible for twenty-two months of the lapse of time and there was a large employee turnover, a bargaining order should not issue.