St. Barnabas Hospital

12 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Son, Inc.

    53 F.3d 261 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that four employees who protested reduction in hours and then later refused a contradictory order to work longer hours engaged in concerted activity
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Portland Airport Limousine Co.

    163 F.3d 662 (1st Cir. 1998)   Cited 4 times

    No. 98-1397 December 21, 1998 On Petition for Enforcement of and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence C. Winger, with whom Kraft Winger were on brief for respondent. Leslie Randolph, Attorney, with whom Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Charles Donnelly, Supervising Attorney, were on brief for petitioner. Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Aldrich and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges

  6. Illinois St. Journal-Register, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 37 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 21 times
    Concluding that the term "employees" in Section 2 is to be interpreted by reference to Section 2
  7. First National Bank of Omaha v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 921 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 20 times

    No. 19356. July 22, 1969. Rehearing Denied August 26, 1969. Clifton L. Elliott and Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner, William E. Morrow, Jr., Omaha, Neb., was on the brief with Clifton L. Elliott, and Harry L. Browne. Robert E. Williams, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief

  8. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    655 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-7541. Argued and Submitted October 9, 1980. Decided March 12, 1981. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc November 12, 1981. James Adler, Munger, Tolles Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for appellant. Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief; Gary Green, Director, Legal Dept., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges and PFAELZER, District Judge. The Honorable Mariana

  9. Isla Verde Hotel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    702 F.2d 268 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 5 times

    No. 82-1427. Argued February 8, 1983. Decided March 14, 1983. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1983. Rafael Buscaglia, Jr., Hato Rey, P.R., with whom Pedro Maldondo Silva, Hato Rey, P.R., was on brief, for petitioner. Paul E. Bateman, Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  10. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    821 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1987)

    Nos. 86-5107, 86-5157. Argued December 9, 1986. Decided June 18, 1987. Jonathan M. Norman (argued), Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner, cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Karen Cordry (argued), John Elligers, Bernard Levine, Regional Director, Region 8, NLRB, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, cross petitioner. Paul Alan Levy (argued), Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae intervenor.