S.S. Joachim & Anne Residence

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates

    2 F.3d 35 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 3 times

    No. 92-3616. Argued March 17, 1993. Decided July 12, 1993. Peter Winkler, Supervisory Atty., Margaret Luke (argued), Atty., Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harriet Lipkin, Debbie Pitcher (argued), Pantaleo Lipkin, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before: STAPLETON, ROTH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: The National