§
SRC Painting LLC

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Greater Kansas City Roofing

    2 F.3d 1047 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Holding it was error to hold sole shareholder personally liable for judgment against corporation she controlled because that there was no evidence to suggest her disregard for many corporate formalities constituted fraud or was done to cause the company to be less able to pay a judgment

  8. Brandon v. Anesthesia & Pain Management Associates, Ltd.

    419 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 40 times
    Finding payments to individual defendants fraudulent conveyances in violation of the UFTA where the payments were intended to prevent a creditor from collecting on his claim

  9. Stardyne, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Board's alter ego analysis involved a policy choice that is consistent with the Act

  10. Firstmark Cap. Corp. v. Hempel Financial Corp.

    859 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 66 times
    In Firstmark Capital, a plaintiff attempted to reach the assets of the wife of the owner of a corporation in order to satisfy a judgment against the corporation.

  11. Section 3304 - Transfer fraudulent as to a debt to the United States

    28 U.S.C. § 3304   Cited 278 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining actual fraudulent transfers