§

Squire Shops, Inc.

218 N.L.R.B. 158 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Squire Shops, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. McGraw-Edison Company v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 67 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 33 times

    No. 19429. December 4, 1969. Paul S. Kuelthau, of Moller, Talent Kuelthau, St. Louis, for petitioner and filed brief and reply brief. John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Robertamarie Kiley, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Burgoyne. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor; Gibson Langsdale, Kansas

  4. J.C. Penney Co. v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 479 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8874. August 29, 1967. William C. McClearn, Denver, Colo. (Robert L. Morris, Morris B. Hecox, Denver, Colo., Eugene F. Rowan and Martin Zeiger, New York City, with him on brief), for petitioner. Peter M. Giesey, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This matter arises from two separate unfair

  5. Texaco, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    436 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 14 times

    No. 17993. January 4, 1971. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1971. Edwin J. Buckley, Chicago, Ill., J.M. Mitchell, New York City, Owen Fair-weather, R. Theodore Clark, Jr., Andrew M. Kramer, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner; Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frank H. Itkin, Baruch A. Fellner, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SWYGERT

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Tom Wood Pontiac, Inc.

    447 F.2d 383 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times
    Usurping union's role in grievance procedure

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Knitting Corp.

    464 F.2d 949 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times
    Granting of wage increases on eve of certification election was coercive

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tommy's Spanish Foods, Inc.

    463 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Tommy's Spanish Foods, Inc., 463 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1972), the employer met with the employees to inform them "[we] would never agree to any union demand to which `we were opposed as a matter of principle.'"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Furnas Electric Company

    463 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times
    Deferring to a Board trial examiner's decision to accord limited probative weight to testimony that "resulted from the propounding of leading questions requiring little more than a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Bell Mfg. Div., Di Giorgio Leisure

    483 F.2d 150 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times

    No. 72-1078. July 31, 1973. Jonathan G. Axelrod (argued), Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, NLRB, Seattle, Wash., Leonard M. Wagman, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George J. Tichy (argued), Spokane, Wash., for respondent. Before BARNES and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge. Of the Northern District of California. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: The Board seeks enforcement of