§

Springfield Dodge, Inc.

218 N.L.R.B. 1429 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Springfield Dodge, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  5. Chauffeurs, Teamsters Help., v. N.L.R.B

    509 F.2d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 15 times

    No. 73-1704. Argued October 31, 1974. Decided December 23, 1974. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles P. Donnelly, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of court with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor

  6. San Francisco Loc. Joint Exec. Bd. v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 794 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 73-1489, 73-1579 and 73-1605. Argued April 5, 1974. Decided June 21, 1974. David Nevins, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Minnesota, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Barry S. Jellison and David J. Salniker were on the brief for petitioners. Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, were on the brief, for respondent

  7. A.J. Krajewski Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 673 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 11 times

    No. 7224. Heard April 8, 1969. Decided July 17, 1969. William J. Sheehan, Providence, R.I., for petitioner. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David C. Nevins, Atty., Washington, D.C. were on brief, for N.L.R.B., respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. On August 24, 1966, Michael Andreoli was called to the

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Tepper

    297 F.2d 280 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Processing of milk by an employer who was primarily a processor and processed milk from other farms not included under exemption

  10. National Labor v. Donna Lee

    435 F.2d 559 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 1 times

    No. 18877. Argued January 7, 1971. Decided January 19, 1971. Arthur L. Fox, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Lewis H. Markowitz, Markowitz, Kagen Griffith, York, Pa. (Thomas H. Reed, York, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before GANEY and ADAMS, Circuit Judges, and WEIS, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT PER