§

Springfield Building and Construction Trades Council

120 N.L.R.B. 600 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Springfield Building and Construction Trades Council

11 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Hill v. Florida

    325 U.S. 538 (1945)   Cited 207 times
    Finding that the filing requirement "in and of itself" does not conflict with the NLRA

  5. Carpenters Union v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 707 (1951)   Cited 89 times
    In Carpenters Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 71 S.Ct. 966, 971, supra, the Supreme Court said: "The use of such pressure on this renovation project was merely a sample of what might be repeated elsewhere if not prohibited. The underlying dispute between petitioners and Watson's has not been shown to have been resolved."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  7. Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 75 times
    In Rabouin v. N.L.R.B., 195 F.2d 906 (2nd Cir., 1962), Justice Clark, then a Circuit Judge, specifically held that a union's demand for damages equal in amount to the wages paid a non-union driver was not an attempted exaction in violation of § 8(b)(6).

  8. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  9. General Drivers, Etc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    247 F.2d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1957)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 13394, 13406. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided May 9, 1957. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Gen. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 886. Mr. Louis P. Poulton, Pasadena, Md., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Maryland, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner Internat. Assn. of Machinists, Local No. 850. Mr. Norton J. Come, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Mr. Marcel

  10. Milk Drivers Dairy Emp. v. N.L.R.B

    245 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 346, 347, Dockets 24368, 24443. Argued May 14, 15, 1957. Decided June 19, 1957. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City, for petitioner Milk Drivers Dairy Employees Local Union No. 338. Thomas L. Parsonnet, of Parsonnet, Weitzman Oransky, Newark, N.J. (Samuel J. Cohen, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner Milk Drivers Dairy Employees Local Union No. 680. Norton J. Come, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost