§

Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskan-toor B.V. v. United Yacht Transport LLC dba United Yacht Transport

91219179 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 2, 2020)
Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskan-toor B.V. v. United Yacht Transport LLC dba United Yacht Transport

19 Cited authorities

  1. Raniola v. Bratton

    243 F.3d 610 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 489 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff was subjected to a hostile work environment where, over a period of two-and-a-half years, the plaintiff was the recipient of "offensive sex-based remarks, disproportionately burdensome work assignments, workplace sabotage, and one serious public threat of physical harm"

  2. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Servs., Inc. of Minn.

    187 F.R.D. 578 (D. Minn. 1999)   Cited 183 times
    Holding that "[a]t a minimum, [the defendant] should appropriately exhaust its current quota of depositions, in order to make an informed request for an opportunity to depose more witnesses, before seeking leave to depose a legion of others"

  3. Bell v. Fowler

    99 F.3d 262 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that the defendant did not intend to mislead or deceive the plaintiff where he inadvertently provided the plaintiff with incorrect information and failed to provide the correct information when he later learned of the mistake

  4. Barrow v. Greenville Independent School Dist.

    202 F.R.D. 480 (N.D. Tex. 2001)   Cited 58 times
    Finding that otherwise a party could indirectly circumvent the cap on depositions by exhausting the maximum allotted number to take those that she could not justify under the Rule 26(b) standards, and then seeking leave to exceed the limit in order to take depositions that she could substantiate

  5. Chevron Corporation v. Shefftz

    754 F. Supp. 2d 254 (D. Mass. 2010)   Cited 21 times
    Finding the third Intel factor favored petitioners because their "request for discovery appeare[d] to be a ‘good faith effort to elicit evidence that ha[d] probative value’ " in foreign arbitral proceedings

  6. Religious Technology Ctr. v. F.A.C.T.Net

    945 F. Supp. 1470 (D. Colo. 1996)   Cited 36 times
    Holding Rule 26(b)(B)'s protections extended to subsequent litigation

  7. Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co.

    840 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding secondary meaning for shape of guitar head always appearing in advertising and promotional literature

  8. Talismanic Props., LLC v. Tipp City

    309 F. Supp. 3d 488 (S.D. Ohio 2017)   Cited 10 times
    Finding that Rule 26(b)(B) applied where the plaintiff originally gained access to a privileged document of the defendant through a public records request, but the plaintiff thereafter produced that same record to the defendant in response to the defendant's discovery requests

  9. Carta v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.

    419 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D. Mass. 2006)   Cited 19 times
    Disqualifying attorneys even though they had represented client for 12 years and two other law firms had declined to take the case

  10. Madison v. Jack Link Associates Stage Lighting & Productions, Inc.

    297 F.R.D. 532 (S.D. Fla. 2013)   Cited 8 times

    For Robert Madison, Plaintiff: Michael T. Moore, LEAD ATTORNEY, Andres Benjamin Chiriboga, Scott Andrew Wagner, Moore & Company, Coral Gables, FL. For Jack Link Associates Stage Lighting & Productions, Inc., Defendant, Cross Defendant: Julie Bork Glassman, Eduardo Cosio, P.A., Coral Gables, FL. OPINION WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS [DE 1291 THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant, Jack Link

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 339,673 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 101,967 times   701 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  13. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 17,117 times   137 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

  14. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,916 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  15. Section 2.120 - Discovery

    37 C.F.R. § 2.120   Cited 23 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the TTAB "in its discretion, may refuse to consider the additional written disclosures or responses"

  16. Section 2.33 - Verified statement for a trademark or service mark

    37 C.F.R. § 2.33   Cited 13 times
    Setting forth the oath enshrining the statutory requirements

  17. Section 2.193 - Trademark correspondence and signature requirements

    37 C.F.R. § 2.193   Cited 4 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a)Signature required. Each piece of correspondence that requires a signature must bear: (1) A handwritten signature personally signed in permanent ink by the person named as the signatory, or a true copy thereof; or (2) An electronic signature that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section, personally entered by the person named as the signatory. The Office will accept an electronic signature that meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section on correspondence filed on paper