§

Spitzer Akron, Inc.

219 N.L.R.B. 20 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Spitzer Akron, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    318 U.S. 80 (1943)   Cited 3,778 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an administrative order cannot be upheld unless the grounds upon which the agency acted in exercising its powers were those upon which its action can be sustained"

  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

    405 U.S. 233 (1972)   Cited 541 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that legally proper practice can still violate Federal Trade Commission Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center

    465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times

    No. 72-1081. August 29, 1972. Bernard Gottfried, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner. Donald G. Schiff, Southfield, Mich., for appellee. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order directing the respondent, the Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc.,

  6. Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    504 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 2 times

    No. 74-1151. October 14, 1974. M. Alfred Roemisch, Donald N. Jaffe, Roemisch Wright, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter Nash, John Irving, Patrick Hardin, Paul Spielberg, Stephen D. Quinn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the NLRB. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and McCREE and LIVELY, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is before the court on a petition to review and set aside the supplemental decision of the National Labor

  7. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it