4 Cited authorities
Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 781 (1996) Cited 59 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 3 times 3 Legal AnalysesNo. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Coach Co.
237 F.2d 907 (6th Cir. 1956) Cited 2 timesNo. 12846. October 30, 1956. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., Charles M. Ryan, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The only substantive question presented is whether the respondent could lawfully refuse to bargain with a union six weeks after it had been certified as bargaining representative, for
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,317 times 84 Legal AnalysesGranting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355