§

Spector Freight System, Inc.

216 N.L.R.B. 551 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Spector Freight System, Inc.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

    405 F.2d 1169 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 405 F.2d 1169 (2nd Cir. 1968) certain supervisors were erroneously included in the bargaining unit.

  3. Arizona Public Service Company v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 228 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 25 times
    Reversing Board Order and Decision finding lack of supervisory power

  4. Cross Baking Co., v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 1346 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 25 times
    In Cross Baking, however, the statement also contained a substantial misstatement of the actual value of the benefits to be received.

  5. Furr's, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    381 F.2d 562 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8686. February 20, 1967. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1967. Certiorari Denied October 9, 1967. See 88 S.Ct. 70. James H. Milam, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner. Anthony J. Obadal, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and ALDRICH and SETH, Circuit Judges. By special designation. MURRAH, Chief Judge. In this unfair labor practice proceedings the Board found the employer

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Big Three Welding Equipment Company

    359 F.2d 77 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that NLRB could not order reinstatement of employees who committed theft

  7. N.L.R.B. v. City Yellow Cab Company

    344 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that at times where no representatives of management were present, switch-board operators were not supervisors in part because company officers were at all times reachable by phone

  8. Eastern Greyhound Lines v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 15477. October 13, 1964. Theodore Voorhees, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner, Matthew J. Broderick, Philadelphia, Pa., Foster J. Fludine, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit

  9. Famet, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 15 times

    No. 73-1832. December 27, 1973. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1974. Herbert S. Matthews, South San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliot Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Regional Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles I. Cohen, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. International Ass'n. of Machinists Aerospace

  10. Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    456 F.2d 298 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 71-1021, 71-1030. March 1, 1972. Charles E. Sykes, Lincoln, Neb., for petitioner Wilkinson Mfg. Co. William A. Jolley, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner United Steelworkers. Howard C. Hay, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from Petitions for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. This labor-management controversy stems from the efforts of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO