Specialty Hospital of Washington - Hadley

23 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 369 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.
560 U.S. 674 (2010) Cited 141 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
KlDd v. Equitable Life Assurance S. of the U. S
522 U.S. 1028 (1997) Cited 42 times
Holding that decisions based on economic considerations do not create violations of anti-discrimination laws even where those decisions only impact employees of the protected age group
Bigda v. Fischbach Corp.
101 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding ERISA contemplates that a top hat plan will be for the benefit of "high-ranking employees"
Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
419 U.S. 301 (1974) Cited 55 times 12 Legal Analyses
Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"
Kallmann v. N.L.R.B
640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 63 times
Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice
Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 24 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

Specialty Hospital of Washington - Hadley

23 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Holding that decisions based on economic considerations do not create violations of anti-discrimination laws even where those decisions only impact employees of the protected age group

Holding ERISA contemplates that a top hat plan will be for the benefit of "high-ranking employees"

Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors