ยง
Southwire Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Waterman Steamship v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    401 U.S. 939 (1971)   Cited 120 times

    C.A. 5th Circuit. No. 1085. March 1, 1971. Reported below: 430 F.2d 1185. Certiorari denied.

  2. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  3. Southern Pacific Communications v. A.T.T

    740 F.2d 980 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that "in such cases market share should be at most a point of departure in determining whether monopoly power exists. Ultimately, a court should focus directly upon the ability of the regulated firm to control prices or exclude competition."

  4. Southwire Company v. N.L.R.B

    383 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Discussing an employer's right to express an opinion regarding unionization rather than its right to unionize

  5. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Recognizing significance of employer's history of ยง 8 violations

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Southwire Company

    352 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. Southwire Co., 352 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1965), we did not enforce a broad cease and desist order where the employer had explicit anti-union animus, established a no solicitation-rule, and discriminately discharged four employees.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Southwire Company

    429 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 20008, 21784. July 27, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 28, 1970. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel Paul Elkind, J.L.A. de Passalacqua, Solomon I. Hirsch, Alfred Brummell, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, Frank M. Swift, Albert E. Phillips, Walter O. Lambeth, Jr., David M. Vaughan, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Before SIMPSON, MORGAN and

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Finesilver Manufacturing Company

    400 F.2d 644 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    Relying on context of antiunion hostility

  9. Southwire Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    393 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 2 times

    No. 24841. April 8, 1968. Frank M. Swift, Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Morgan C. Stanford, Atlanta, Ga. (Intervenor), for respondent. Adair, Goldthwaite, Standford Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., Irving Abramson, Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Associate Gen. Counsel, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor, Industrial Union