Southwire Co.

11 Cited authorities

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company
289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 32 times
No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement
N.L.R.B. v. United Aircraft
324 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1963) Cited 23 times
In NLRB v. United Aircraft Corp., 324 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 951, 84 S.Ct. 969 (1964), the company rule prohibited distribution of union literature in nonworking areas of the company's premises.
N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company
277 F.2d 641 (7th Cir. 1960) Cited 25 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. John S. Swift Co., 277 F.2d 641; National Labor Relations Board v. Knight Morley Corp., 251 F.2d 753; National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Silk Mills, 209 F.2d 155; National Labor Relations Board v. J.I. Case Co., 198 F.2d 919.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Arthur Winer, Inc.
194 F.2d 370 (7th Cir. 1952) Cited 26 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Arthur Winer, Inc., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 370, 373 (1952), there was a "serious question" of the sufficiency of evidence to sustain many findings of the examiner.
Sunshine Biscuits, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
274 F.2d 738 (7th Cir. 1960) Cited 17 times
No. 12695. February 8, 1960. David B. Buerger, Pittsburgh, Pa., Buchanan, Ingersoll, Rodewald, Kyle Buerger, Pittsburgh, Pa. (William F. Jetter, Jr., Long Island City, N.Y., of counsel), for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Morton Namrow, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., Attys, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is before
N.L.R.B. v. Kaye
272 F.2d 112 (7th Cir. 1959) Cited 14 times
No. 12617. November 5, 1959. Rehearing Denied December 28, 1959. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, George Schatzki, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John H. Doesburg, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before MAJOR, PARKINSON and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court upon the petition
N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Company
319 F.2d 424 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 10 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Co., 7 Cir., 319 F.2d 424, employees were told that if they wanted to work at the company's plant they had better take off their union buttons.
N.L.R.B. v. Idaho Potato Processors, Inc.
322 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1963)
No. 18390. September 17, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Lee M. Modjeska, and Glen Bendixsen, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and KUNZEL, District Judge. KUNZEL, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e)), the National Labor
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Southwire Co.

11 Cited authorities

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

In NLRB v. United Aircraft Corp., 324 F.2d 128 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 951, 84 S.Ct. 969 (1964), the company rule prohibited distribution of union literature in nonworking areas of the company's premises.

In National Labor Relations Board v. John S. Swift Co., 277 F.2d 641; National Labor Relations Board v. Knight Morley Corp., 251 F.2d 753; National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Silk Mills, 209 F.2d 155; National Labor Relations Board v. J.I. Case Co., 198 F.2d 919.

In N.L.R.B. v. Arthur Winer, Inc., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 370, 373 (1952), there was a "serious question" of the sufficiency of evidence to sustain many findings of the examiner.

In N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Co., 7 Cir., 319 F.2d 424, employees were told that if they wanted to work at the company's plant they had better take off their union buttons.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"