A.F. of L. v. Labor Board

Holding that certification is not a final order

Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

Construing "affecting commerce"

Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

Modern Manufacturing v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz

Upholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"