§

Southwest Engraving Co.

198 N.L.R.B. 694 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Southwest Engraving Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  4. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  5. C.H. Guenther Son, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 21 times

    No. 27495. June 1, 1970. Allen P. Schoolfield, Jr., Dallas, Tex., John H. Wood, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail C. Basker, Washington, D.C., N.L.R.B., Clifford W. Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the Court upon petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against C.H. Guenther Son, Inc., doing

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

    320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)

  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. 182, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    401 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 73, 74, Dockets 32267, 32268. Argued September 19, 1968. Decided October 3, 1968. Certiorari Denied March 10, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 1010. John E. Nevins, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., on the brief, for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: The National