Southland Manufacturing Corp.
4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
396 U.S. 258 (1969) Cited 184 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation
354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 96 timesIn Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.
Braswell v. United States
224 F.2d 706 (10th Cir. 1955) Cited 39 timesHolding that mistaken understanding regarding one's status as a person prohibited from possessing a firearm was a mistake of law, and thus, "no defense"
United Hatters, Cap, W. Int. U. v. N.L.R.B
375 F.2d 325 (D.C. Cir. 1967) Cited 1 timesNos. 20086, 20235. Argued December 19, 1966. Decided February 23, 1967. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliot Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 20086. Mr. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst